![]() As for e-motion rollers, try simulating 20% hill on those ans see how far does it get you. Your bike has quite a big degree of free movement on that trainer. The rear wheel rides freely on big roller and the front part is flexible. Otherwise its just another rigid stationary reality trainer, so not worth $5000 imo. ![]() So, question, one having a Computrainer could simply install the Veloreality software and run his Computrainer with it, and thus enjoy the Veloreality videos using his Computrainer, hence achieve best of both worlds at 2000$?Īnyone owing a Computrainer here ever tryed it? or would be willing to try to see?īricky21 wrote:That technology needs to be integrated into a set of E motion rollers. If I read correct, the Veloreality trainer software supports the Computrainer: Best of both worlds? Maybe, but they're asking 5000$. It has the real life video (similar to Tacx) and it seems to work well (as Computrainer). In the last days I found the Lynx Trainer, made by Veloreality: But I prefer the Computrainer unit as it provides more accurate power readings than the Tacx unit. I prefer the real life video of Tacx over the ergvideo of Computrainer. Had the Tacx i-genius and Computrainer on the list.Īs well the Wahoo Kickr but not so anymore since I'm not a fan of removing and putting back the rear wheel. I was thinking about purchasing a trainer this winter.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |